Absurd and Askew

My thoughts as I think them.

Subscribe
Add to Technorati Favourites
Add to del.icio.us
May 21, 2009

If you don't want them, don't have them

Posted by Mustang Sally

Came across another heartbreaking CNN story... (read it here)...

The especially cruel part -- not that killing your own child isn't cruel enough -- is that she suffocated him, changed her mind, performed CPR on him and brought him back to life, then decided to follow through with it and suffocated him again. Her excuse was that she didn't want him to grow up unloved like she did. Damn, woman! There were plenty of options before you got pregnant and plenty of options after. Did you have to have a child at all? She sounds like she has mental problems (depression, etc.), but it's so heartbreaking for that poor little boy. What must have been going through his mind when his mommy killed him not once, but twice?

May 13, 2009

Really? Is it that important?

Posted by Mustang Sally

Sheesh. I keep seeing all these people on the internet both bashing and praising Miss California's answer to the "gay marriage" question during the Miss USA competition. Some people are calling her dumb. And Miss California is dumb why? Because she was honest in her answer and it didn't match the stand these people take on the subject? Wow. It's incredibly hypocritical to preach tolerance and the acceptance of any select social, race, or faith group and then in the very same breath say incredibly rude and obnoxious (and unfounded, I might add) things about her for being part of one of those groups (Christian) that doesn't share your belief.


Contrary to popular belief, it's not always those who perceive themselves as being targeted who are being the oh-so-tolerant ones, judging by how incredibly intolerant and name-calling they are of anyone who doesn't share their beliefs. For anyone who doesn't know, the Perez judge that asked that question later called Miss California a "b*tch" and a "c*nt" for her answer. Yeah, that's tolerance alright. Same as everyone who calls her stupid because she said she was against it. Way to make your point. Look like an angry, name-slinging child and maybe people will take your belief seriously. That's the way to win people over to your side. Not to mention that very often people who are saying she was wrong (and stupid and a b*tch) mention Christianity as some sort of evil and stupid and blah blah blah. Where is your tolerance for people who have Christian beliefs? You're allowed to be intolerant of them and call them names, but one of them can't give you an honest (and also polite... she wasn't bashing anyone) answer to a direct question about her beliefs.

Hypocrits.

In the end, I have to just say this (what I've been thinking all along)... people, this IS a beauty contest we're talking about. Everyone is paying waaaay too much attention to this. Who cares what miss beautiful California thinks? (Which, btw, is the same position Obama takes on gay marriage. I guess he's dumb, too.) I guarantee you that she didn't get into the competition because of her mind. The title is awarded primarily for BEAUTY, regardless of what they claim. I've never seen an ugly (or even slightly unattractive) Miss Any-state. The question and answer game at the end is only so the womens rights groups won't have a hissy and shut them down.

So, in conclusion, just a bit of advice. Do what you will with it, but here it is...

Don't preach tolerance and expect it to work in your favor if you don't practice it yourself. Every bash on Christianity or Republicans or conservatives or whatever that slips out of your mouth (or keyboard) reflects on exactly how intolerant you are.

Choose your battles. In the case of Miss California, I would say that she was a little firecracker that everyone should have just quietly walked around. Instead, they've been sidetracked by her. Silly kids. There are much bigger battles up ahead that actually would mean something to your fight for the right to gay marriage.

May 6, 2009

What the hell is wrong with people?!

Posted by Mustang Sally

There's something far worse than swine flu going around. It's this total disregard for life and the innocents (the true innocents, our kids) are getting the worst end of it. I read this story on the CNN website this morning (see the link at the end for the actual CNN story) and I'm at a total loss as to what could possess anyone to do such a thing and not be completely insane.

This 21-year old dumbass (barely an adult himself) got into an argument with his ex-girlfriend at her apartment and picked up her 3-month-old son's car seat, with her son still in it, and threw it onto the concrete floor. Oh, but he didn't stop there. He then kidnapped the baby and proceeded to throw him out of a moving car on the interstate -- not in his car seat. Just tossed him out the window. A passing motorist found this little 3-month-old body on the road where he died of -- surprise -- blunt force trauma to the head. 3 friggin' months old! What would possess anyone to do such an incredibly cruel thing?

Remember when people considered the consequences of their actions? Remember when you were an outcast for being a criminal? Remember when we had some kind of social, moral, ethical, whatever you want to call it, values and the thought of throwing a 3-month-old baby out of a moving vehicle would never even cross our minds? Look at us now.

The more violence we see and hear about, the more we become numb. Nothing shocks us anymore. We've created a society that hungers for the extreme. Sadly, that extreme is coming out in ways that are making our younger (and youngest) generation suffer. Violence and extremes are now the norm and to cause someone else pain -- to exact that huge negative act of revenge -- young minds are automatically turning to deeds more gruesome than ever before. It's not a new scenario, but it's definitely now an epidemic.

Our kids are eating themselves alive.

Here's the actual CNN story: Florida Man Charged With Murder After Baby Thrown From Car